PersonalSec

Putting your security FIRST with CCTV and system reviews

  • HOME
  • CCTV Reviews
    • CCTV & Security Cameras
      • Arlo
        • Arlo Wireless Home Security Cameras
        • Arlo 5 Camera CCTV Package
      • Zmodo
        • Zmodo 8 Channel 4x 600TVL Cam
        • Zmodo PKD-DK4216-500GB H.264 3G 4 Camera CCTV System + DVR + 500GB HD
        • Zmodo PKD-DK4216 4 Camera System
        • Zmodo PKD-DK0855 Camera CCTV System + 500gb HD
        • Zmodo Z-PROW44B-1T 720P HD 4CH Wireless NVR Security System + 1TB Hard Drive
        • Zmodo ZP-KB1I04 720P 4 CH CCTV System + 4 White Cameras
        • Zmodo KHI8-YARUZ8ZN 8 Camera CCTV System
      • Funlux
        • Funlux 8 Channel 720p CCTV IP Kit With 500GB HDrive
        • Funlux Outdoor CCTV 8CH 960H System +TB HD
        • Funlux 4 Channel CCTV System + 500GB Hard Drive
      • Ring
        • Ring WI-FI Enabled Video Doorbell
      • Zosi
        • Zosi Wide Angle 4 Camera Night Vision CCTV Kit
        • Zosi Night Vision Camera
      • Amcrest
        • Amcrest 960H X 4 CCTV Security System
        • Amcrest 720P 4CH CCTV System + 4 IP66 Bullet Cameras + 1TB Hard Drive
      • Fujikam
        • Fujikam FI-361 HD IP Camera
      • IntelliSecu
        • IntelliSecu 7″ Intelligent IR High Speed PTZ
      • Sannce
        • Sannce FULL HD 960 8 Channel CCTV System
        • SANNCE 8CH 960H DVR + 4x 900TVL CCTV Cameras
      • Annke
        • Annke AHD 720P 8CH HVR/DVR/NVR 3 in 1 CCTV
      • Samsung
        • Samsung SDS-P5080N 8 Camera 16 Channel DVR + 1TB HDD
        • Samsung SDH-C5100 16 Channel 720p HD CCTV System + 2TB HD
      • GW Security
        • GW Security 8 Channel HD 1600TVL 960P CCTV System + 2TB HDD & 8 X Dome Cameras
        • GW Security 8 Channel 1080P CCTV System
        • GW Security 32-Channel HD-TVI 1080P CCTV System
      • LA View
        • LaView LV-KN988P86A4-T2 8 Channel CCTV System 6 IP 1080P Cameras + 2 TB HD
        • LaView LV-KN996P1612A4-T3 16 Channel CCTV System + 12 1080P IP Cameras + 3 TB HDD
      • Elec
        • Elec 8 Channel CCTV System + 8 Cameras + 1TBHD
      • Floureon
        • FLOUREON 4CH 960H CCTV DVR System with 1TB HDD
      • USG
        • USG 4K H.265 CCTV Sytem + 3TB HDD
      • Swann
        • Swann 8 Channel 960H Digital Video Recorder & 4 X PRO-735 Cameras
  • IP Cameras
    • Dropcam
      • Dropcam Pro
    • HooToo
      • HooToo HT-IP006N PTZ PRO Wireless IP Security Camera
    • Foscam
      • Foscam FI9828W PTZ Outdoor Surveillance Camera
      • Foscam FI9821W V2 (HD) Wireless IP Video Camera
      • FOSCAM FI8910W Wireless IP Video Camera
    • Amcrest
      • Amcrest ProHD 1080P IP2M-841B
    • Annke
      • ANNKE SP1 1280x720P Cloud IP Camera
    • D-Link
  • Home Security Systems Reviews
    • SimpliSafe
      • SimpliSafe Starter-Ultimate Packages
      • Simplisafe Complete Security System
    • PiSector
      • PiSector PS03-M Wireless Security Alarm System
      • PiSector GSM06-S Dual Network Wireless Security Alarm
      • PiSector GS80-L
    • Fortress
      • Fortress S02-B Wireless Home Security System
      • Fortress GSM-B Wireless GSM Alarm
    • Honeywell
      • Honeywell L5200 ZWave
    • GE
      • GE Personal Security Alarm
    • Scout
      • Scout ARTIC Wireless Home Security Alarm
This post may contain affiliate links, which cost you nothing, and help to support this site.

April 26, 2016 by Personal Sec Leave a Comment

Was Apple Right To Deny The FBI?

Was Apple right to deny the FBI access to the data on the San Bernardino’s terrorists phone? Apple says it has wider implications for privacy in general and that they wouldn’t be able to access any usable data anyway. As the debate has rage the FBI have been accused of using the same torture tactics commonly used by the CIA.

 

 

In justifying their efforts to get into San Bernardino shooter Syed Farook’s iPhone, the FBI is now using the same logic that the CIA used to justify torturing people who had no information to share.

From the start of the FBI’s efforts to get into Farook’s phone, it was fairly clear there’d be nothing on it. What kind of terrorist, planning to attack his co-workers at a holiday party, would coordinate his planning on his work-issued phone?

Plus, Farook went to some lengths to make data on his other devices unavailable. He destroyed two personal cell phones and successfully hid a hard drive. That he didn’t make the same effort with his work phone should have been the tip off for the nation’s top law enforcement agency that there would be nothing there.  – source here

 

But it turns out the FBI had already hacked the i-Phone anyway. The debate has opened up a can of worms on the sacrosanct of privacy. Here is a timeline of the full events;

 

Last month, a federal judge asked Apple to help the FBI unlock an iPhone belonging to Syed Farook, who was responsible for the shootings in San Bernardino in December which left 14 people dead.

The judge asked Apple to provide “reasonable technical assistance” to the U.S. authorities, which would require the technology giant to overhaul the system that disables the phone after 10 unsuccessful password attempts. Once this feature kicks in, all the data on the phone is inaccessible. Apple declined to help the FBI.

At the time, Apple chief executive Tim Cook called the order “chilling” and said that it would require writing new software that would be “a master key, capable of opening hundreds of millions of locks”. Cook’s argument was that if the FBI could access this iPhone, nothing would stop them from doing it to many others.

Law enforcement authorities insisted that it was a one-off request. As a result the case went to court.

 

Why was it controversial?

The case marked one of the highest-profile clashes in the debate over encryption and data privacy between the government and a technology company.

Law enforcement authorities say that encryption used by the likes of Apple makes it harder for them to solve cases and stop terrorist attacks.

Technology firms have kicked back, saying that encryption is key to protecting user data from hackers.

Data privacy has been a sensitive topic particularly after revelations by former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden about the extent of the government’s surveillance activities.

 

What was the outcome?

A hearing set for last week was postponed after the government said that it had found a third-party that was able to unlock the iPhone. Reports suggested that it was Israeli firm Cellebrite. This was never confirmed by the company.

On Monday, the Department of Justice said it had managed to access the data on the iPhone in question and asked the judge to drop the case. The FBI said in a statement that it could not comment on the “technical aspects” of how the iPhone was unlocked nor the third-party that was involved.

Apple said that it “will continue to help law enforcement with their investigations, as we have done all along, and we will continue to increase the security of our products as the threats and attacks on our data”.

 

Who won?

It appears to be the best of a bad situation.

Apple stuck to its guns on defending civil liberties.

“From the beginning, we objected to the FBI’s demand that Apple build a backdoor into the iPhone because we believed it was wrong and would set a dangerous precedent. As a result of the government’s dismissal, neither of these occurred,” Apple said in a statement following the dropping of the case.

The FBI got their desire result – getting access to Farook’s iPhone.

Still, there are questions about the effectiveness of Apple’s security.

 

Is this the end of it all?

Probably not. Rumblings between technology companies and the government are likely to continue.

Last month, several news outlets revealed that there have been numerous requests from law enforcement agencies across the country for Apple to help unlock other iPhones.

Apple will want to know how the FBI got into the iPhone in order for it to patch up any vulnerabilities in its software. The iPhone maker is likely to continue bolstering security in its software and devices.  – source: CNN

 

Conclusion

Big brother is watching you. To paraphrase Laurence Oliver in The Running Man, “Is it safe-er”? Is it legal? Or are Apple hypocrites as the use our data everyday to sell us more stuff and to steal all our demographic data. Unless of course we opt out. In that case is there not an opt out button for the terror of big brother?

Or are you comfortable that the government is looking into your data to prevent you from terrorist attacks? Does this not go hand-in-hand with modern security. Are we all just a little too paranoid and concerned about our rights. The greater good and all that, the lesser of two evils? Or too much power in the wrong hands….

the debate will continue…..

 

Related

Filed Under: News

You must log in to post a comment.

News

  • Was Apple Right To Deny The FBI?
  • New Breakthrough In CCTV Technology
  • Clooney Installs A Massive CCTV System In New Home
  • Simplisafe Announce New Cameras
<more>

Security Systems

  • PiSector PS03-M Wireless Home Security Auto Dial Alarm System
  • Fortress S02-B Wireless Home Security Alarm
  • Zmodo 8 Channel Surveillance Camera System 4x 600TVL Cameras With 500GB HD
<more>

Advertise With Us

Recent Reviews

  • Was Apple Right To Deny The FBI?
  • GW Security 32-Channel HD-TVI 1080P CCTV System Review
  • Lorex LH024501C4WB 4-Channel CCTV SYSTEM with Stratus Connectivity Review
  • Lorex LW2110 Wireless Digital Security Camera Review
  • Lorex LW2231 Complete Wireless CCTV Camera

  • About
  • Disclosure
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact

Copyright © 2023 · Personal Security

Copyright © 2023 · Generate Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in